Nuremberg Trials essays

Nuremberg Trials essays After World War II, the victorious Allies launched an indictment against 24 individuals with a variety of crimes, including the deliberate instigation of aggressive wars, extermination of racial and religious groups, murder and mistreatment of prisoners of war, and the deportation to slave labor of hundreds of thousands of people living in countries occupied by Germany during the war. Among the accused were Nationalists Socialists leaders Rudolf Hess, and Hermann Goring. These trials lasted from November 20, 1945 until October 1, 1946. Most of the evidence was gained by the prosecution from the Allied forces after the collapse of the German government. The trials lasted over 3 years and the effects they had on the world were astounding. Although the Allies claimed they would give the accused a fair and just trial, but the trials were biased and unjust. The Nuremberg Trials were biased acts of vengeance, were the rules and laws were not followed, and only the Nazis were accused. After the war, each one of the countries on the Allied side had their own idea of how to deal with the Nazis. Stalin suggested that they should have trials, but thought everyone was guilty and should be shot. Then there would be no point in a trial because it would just be the slaughtering of whom ever was convicted. He also wanted to do this because he could say it was fair, because he gave them a trial. Churchill even said that they should just be lined up and shot. Since the leaders of the Allies were saying such things as this, it is obvious that the trials were bias. Especially since the Allies ran the trials and each allied country had its own persecutors. All the judges at the trials came from the victorious countries as well. Most of the judges were American or Russian. So there wasnt even a difference of opinion when deciding the fate of these peoples lives. It was a very one-sided trial. During the trials, the Americans ...